Clouds

Clouds
Showing posts with label indifference. Show all posts
Showing posts with label indifference. Show all posts

Monday, January 7, 2013

Chicken vs. Egg?



I can remember really puzzling over that question, wondering how a person could actually know which came first. I believe I was well into my teens before I realized that, for a Christian who believed in the six days of Creation, it was a no-brainer.

The God Who created the world in six real, twenty-four hour days did everything in a carefully ordered way. He didn’t just start creating things willy-nilly – He followed a meticulously thought out plan. How do I know? Because 7,000 plus years since the Fall of Adam and Eve, the world is still so orderly that almost every part of it can be described in mathematical formulas.

Do you realize that almost everything in our world can be described by a single set of numbers? They’re called the Fibonacci numbers and the visual equivalent, the Golden Mean and is a sequence of numbers, starting with 0, 1 and continuing 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13. Each new number equals the two numbers before it. This is only the first few numbers – they go on forever, but the ratio is 1.618033988749895… The whole concept gets pretty math heavy and I get pretty lost, but when I can see that rose petals wrap around their stem using that pattern, sea shells follow the Golden spiral, and so many things in nature contain the same ratio over and over again, I’m led to the conclusion that God laid out our world along very strict guidelines.
“John Polkinghorne, a theoretical physicist and a minister, claims that the equations that guide physics point to a Creator. Polkinhorne said, ‘Physicists are deeply impressed with the order of the world. It is rationally beautiful and structured, and the feeling that there is a mind behind it is a very natural feeling to have …. I think the feeling of wonder, which is fundamental to the experience of physicists … is fundamentally a religious experience, whether people recognize it or not.’”[1]
In Genesis 1, God worked from general to specific. He didn’t create an living thing until He had created a place where it could survive.
“Then God said, ‘Let the waters under the heavens be gathered together into one place, and let the dry land appear’; and it was so. And God called the dry land Earth, and the gathering together of the waters He called Seas. And God saw that it was good.
“Then God said, ‘Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb that yields seed, and the fruit tree that yields fruit according to its kind, whose seed is in itself, on the earth’; and it was so. And the earth brought forth grass, the herb that yields seed according to its kind, and the tree that yields fruit, whose seed is in itself according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. So the evening and the morning were the third day.” Genesis 1:9-13
The whole Genesis account of Creation shows a thoughtful and concerned Creator who carefully built a beautiful home for His creations. Not even a blade of grass was created until the system to keep it alive was in place.

On the other hand, we have the theories of Charles Darwin built around his research on the Galapagos Islands. His ideas involve natural selection and don’t describe any logic or purpose just an on-going struggle for survival. If God were to use a theory like the one described by Darwin, He would have to be described as careless, wasteful and cruel to just pitch ideas for creatures out into the planet and see which ones survived.

That would be like me deciding to plant a garden in my backyard so I just gathered up a whole bunch of seed of all different kinds and just pitched them out into the yard. Then I just watched to see what would come up. I didn’t prepare the ground for the seeds or make sure the seeds went into the right kind of soil or in the right amount of sunlight. I didn’t worry about whether or not the seeds could even grow in my area of the country. If the plants made it, great, but if the weeds took over and none of them made it, that’s ok too. In my backyard, that would mean I’d end up with very little of anything edible, just Johnson grass and sticker burs. I would have wasted a lot of seeds.

Anyway, how would you feel about God if He was so indifferent about how things went on His planet? Would you be interested in worshipping Him? or praying to Him?

I believe that the way we picture Creation has everything to do with the way we picture God.
“Some theologians argue that God is not indifferent to natural evil, but, rather, God is limited in His very nature so that He is good but limited in power. Hence, while He desires to do something about the pain and suffering in the world, He is unable.
“A second option offered asserts that while God is all-powerful, His greatest desire is the complete freedom of the cosmos to self-create and self-determine. This freedom is said to be more important to God than imposing some kind of order or design on the universe. Advocates of this view tend to express God as being in a power-sharing relationship with the universe, with the universe participating in its own creation.
“A third option is Deism. In this view, God launches all the natural processes and then absents Himself like a disinterested, absentee landlord. While this God may have all power, He shows little or no personal interest in the affairs of humankind. In this construct, God is highly unlikely to personally interact or intervene with any particularity in the affairs of earth’s history.”[2]
What a blessing to know that our God is not limited in any way, that He maintains His control over the universe, and that He cares about each and every one of us.

I know I end with John 3:16-17 often, but I just don’t believe we can be reminded enough of how involved God wants to be in every aspect of our lives and that, more than anything else, He wants to spend eternity with us. Take just a couple more seconds and really read and think about every word. Each one was written just for you and for me.

“For God so greatly loved and dearly prized the world that He [even] gave up His only begotten (unique) Son, so that whoever believes in (trusts in, clings to, relies on) Him shall not perish (come to destruction, be lost) but have eternal (everlasting) life.
“For God did not send the Son into the world in order to judge (to reject, to condemn, to pass sentence on) the world, but that the world might find salvation and be made safe and sound through Him.” John 3:16-17AMP




[1] Pallab Ghosh, "Historic Hunt for 'God Particle,'" BBC News (9-10-08)
[2] Stephen Bauer, PhD, The Lesson in Brief and Learning Cycle, Lesson 2, Origins-Adult Sabbath School Bible Study Guide

Sunday, December 18, 2011

FIRST!

Thoughts on the Sabbath School Lesson for 12.24.11

We live in a world that tells us to take ours first and let everybody else fend for himself.  Just this week, I was chatting with a couple of co-workers when one of them said, “You have to grab what you want and hang onto it; that’s what life’s all about.”

I was so stunned that, before I thought, I blurted, “No it’s not.”  To which the reply was, “You have to take care of yourself, nobody else is going to.”

And I should have replied that Jesus takes care of us…but I’m afraid I just stood there with my mouth mentally hanging open.

Now, I don’t want you to think that I’m free of the whole “me first” way of thinking, I’m totally not.  I was just shocked to hear it said out loud as a life philosophy.  Where my co-worker embraces that way of looking at life, I bury it under layers of self-delusion and guilt.  Whether it’s obvious to the people around us or not, everyone has some “me first” tucked away somewhere.

You think not?  Check this out:
“A 2011 paper by a team of psychologists at UCLA analyzed the values of characters in popular television shows for the past four decades. They evaluated TV shows that were popular among a preteen audience—Andy Griffith and The Lucy Show (from the 1960s); Laverne & Shirley and Happy Days (from the 1970s); and American Idol and Hannah Montana (from the past decade).
“The researchers observed the following shifts in values:
“The number one value of recent popular TV shows for preteens was "fame." In contrast, from 1967-1997, the number one value was ‘community feeling, or being part of a group.’
“In 2007, ‘community feeling’ had dropped to eleventh place.
“In 2007, the number two value from 1997—‘benevolence or being kind to others and helping them’—had fallen from second to thirteenth.
“The value of ‘tradition,’ which was ranked fourth in 1997, had dropped to fifteenth place in the 2007 study.
“One of the researchers said, ‘I was shocked, especially by the dramatic changes in the last 10 years. I thought fame would be important but did not expect this drastic an increase or such a dramatic decrease in other values, such as community feeling. If you believe that television reflects the culture, as I do, then American culture has changed drastically.’
“Although Disney shows like Hannah Montana and Jonas L.A. may be fun and entertaining, the not-so-subtle message is clear: if you want your life to count, then find ways to be famous. As another member of the research team said, ‘The rise of fame in preteen television may be one influence in the documented rise of narcissism in our culture …. Preteens are at an age when they want to be popular, just like the famous teenagers they see on TV and the Internet.’”[1]
The drive to be first, though, can ultimately lead to frightening levels of indifference: what I want takes precedence over everything and everybody else.
“The following is a dialogue from the once-popular sitcom, Seinfield, between Elaine and her boyfriend.
“Elaine asks, ‘Do you believe in God?’
“‘Yes,’ her boyfriend replies.
“Elaine asks, ‘Is it a problem that I'm not religious?’
“‘Not for me,’ her boyfriend answers.
“‘How's that?’ she asks.
“Her boyfriend says, ‘I'm not the one going to hell.’”[2]
And then we hear the laugh track:  “Ha, ha, ha.”  Does it bother anyone that even someone who claims to “believe in God,” has a philosophy that says, “As long as I’m okay, who cares about you?”

Isn’t that the same kind of spiritual trap that the Pharisees fell into?  God wanted them to share the truth with the world, but they hoarded it instead.
“On April 12, 1999, Elie Wiesel … world-renowned humanitarian and author spoke about ‘The Perils of Indifference’:
“‘What is indifference? … Can one possibly view indifference as a virtue? Is it necessary at times to practice it simply to keep one's sanity, live normally, enjoy a fine meal and a glass of wine, as the world around us experiences harrowing upheavals?
“‘Of course, indifference can be tempting—more than that, seductive. It is so much easier to look away from victims. It is so much easier to avoid such rude interruptions to our work, our dreams, our hopes. It is, after all, awkward, troublesome, to be involved in another person's pain and despair. Yet, for the person who is indifferent, his or her neighbor are [sic] of no consequence. And, therefore, their lives are meaningless. …
“‘Indifference, after all, is more dangerous than anger and hatred. Anger can at times be creative. One writes a great poem, a great symphony. One does something special for the sake of humanity because one is angry at the injustice that one witnesses. But indifference is never creative. Even hatred at times may elicit a response. …
“‘Indifference elicits no response. Indifference is not a response. Indifference is not a beginning; it is an end. And, therefore, indifference is always the friend of the enemy, for it benefits the aggressor—never his victim, … The political prisoner in his cell, the hungry children, the homeless refugees—not to respond to their plight, not to relieve their solitude by offering them a spark of hope is to exile them from human memory. And in denying their humanity, we betray our own.’”[3]
“Carry each other’s burdens, and in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ. If anyone thinks they are something when they are not, they deceive themselves. Each one should test their own actions. Then they can take pride in themselves alone, without comparing themselves to someone else, for each one should carry their own load. Nevertheless, the one who receives instruction in the word should share all good things with their instructor.
“Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. Whoever sows to please their flesh, from the flesh will reap destruction; whoever sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life. Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up. Therefore, as we have opportunity, let us do good to all people, especially to those who belong to the family of believers.”  Galatians 6:2-10
If I truly believe that I am saved by grace (and I do), what must my “philosophy of life” be?  Do I have any excuse to exclude anyone from the saving love of Jesus Christ?  Is anyone less worthy than I am to receive His salvation?


[1] Stuart Wolpert, "Popular TV Shows Teach Children Fame Is Most Important Value, UCLA Psychologists Report," UCLA Newsroom (7-11-11); submitted by Jared E. Alcantara, Princeton, New Jersey
[2] John Fehlen, Stanwood, Washington
[3]Elie Wiesel, "The Perils of Indifference," www.americanrhetoric.com; submitted by Jerry Deluca, Montreal West, Quebec, Canada